 
Writing
and Submitting Curricular Change Proposals
Proposals to the Curriculum Committee normally fall into two categories.
(1) Proposals to accept specific (temporary) Special Topics courses (numbered
X60) as satisfying either a General Degree Requirement or a
departmental major or minor requirement. These proposals generally only
require Committee approval, and do not entail revisions in the Catalog.
(2) Proposals to institute new courses or
programs (other than Special Topics courses), or to delete or modify existing courses or programs.
(This category includes proposals to accept existing courses as satisfying
some GDR or LADR.) These generally require Faculty approval and always
entail some revision of the College Catalog.
Specific guidelines for the
preparation of proposals of these two types appear below.
Proposals should
be submitted to the Dean of Academic Affairs, who will review them for
transmittal to the Committee. Proposals printed on paper
are, of course, acceptable, but it will save paper and speed the Committee's
work if proposals are submitted electronically as Microsoft Word files
(or text files; formatting is not critical). Be sure and "Save" files
before sending them off as e-mail attachments, as e-mail programs will
attach the most recently saved version of a document (rather than any
newer, but as yet unsaved, version that might be in your word processor
window when you press the e-mail "Send" button).
Each proposal
or group of proposals should be signed by all members of the proposing
department(s) (other than those who may be on leave
or otherwise unavailable), with an indication of which of these members
are in favor of the proposal and which (if any) are opposed to it. Any
members who are opposed should be invited to communicate the reasons
for their opposition to the Committee. If the proposal is being submitted
electronically, a signature sheet may be sent to the Dean's Office under
separate cover.
Also on this list of department members, please indicate
which member(s) should be contacted by the Committee in case the Committee
wishes to
ask more questions about the proposal.
Guidelines for Proposals of Type
(1)
Proposals need to do all of the following, preferably in the order
given:
1. Describe the Special Topics course(s) involved (title, summary
of content, prerequisites).
2. Tell which requirement(s) (GDRs or departmental major/minor requirements)
the course(s) is/are proposed to satisfy.
3. Give a brief rationale for the proposal. In particular, explain
(in terms understandable by readers outside the discipline) how the
course(s) plan to achieve the goals behind the indicated requirements.
Guidelines
for Proposals of Type (2)
Proposals need to do all of the following, preferably in the order given:
1. Describe the proposed curricular changes.
If new courses or changes in existing courses are being proposed,
briefly describe these. (Detailed material for the College Catalog
will be requested below.) If you propose to delete existing courses,
tell which ones they are. If you are proposing that courses be added
to or removed from some list(s) of requirements (major, minor, GDR,
LADR), list these changes.
2. Give a brief rationale for the proposal.
In particular, explain (in terms understandable by readers
outside the discipline) how the course(s) plan to achieve the goals
of any
existing requirements (major, minor, or GDR) which they are proposed
to satisfy.
If the proposed change is supported by, or is a response
to, existing assessment data, please describe those data as part of
the rationale.
3. Report any new resources that will be required in
order to implement the proposal.
List or describe any resources not
currently at hand (library holdings, lab equipment, consumable materials,
support staff, etc,) which will
be required for the implementation of your proposals, and indicate
where you expect the funding for these to come from (Department budget,
regular departmental library allocation, Departmental Gift Fund, etc.)
4.
For new, or significantly altered, courses, describe the goals of the
proposed course(s) in terms of desired student learning outcomes,
and tell how the degree of attainment of these goals will be assessed.
This information will be transmitted to the Assessment Committee.
In many cases, assessment of outcomes will be based on regular student
assignments made within a course.
5. For new or existing courses being
proposed to (eventually) satisfy Liberal Arts Distribution Requirements
(LADRs) under the Vision Plan:
LADR courses must address all the objectives listed in the Academic
Vision Plan for the specific LADR(s) involved, and at least two of
the overall objectives of the LADR program.
Click here to refer to a list of LADR objectives
Proposals for such courses should therefore identify the
two or more "overall" objectives that are to be addressed,
and explain why the proposed courses will have a good chance at achieving
both the chosen "overall" objectives and all of the specific
objectives for the individual LADR(s) involved.
Further, the proposal must identify one or several of the aforementioned
objectives whose degree of achievement will be assessed when the course(s)
is/are offered for the first time, and describe student assignments that
will be used (one within each course) in performing this assessment.
For assistance in formulating such assignments, contact the Assessment
Committee. The data eventually generated from these assignments, in addition
to being used in departmental assessment, are to be made available to
the Assessment Committee.
If a proposed LADR course is also being proposed to satisfy an existing
GDR until the LADR system is implemented, please address the objectives
of the given GDR as well (if they are different).
6. Describe all the changes in the Catalog that will be required to implement
the proposal.
[If you are only proposing to have an existing course satisfy
a GDR or (eventually) satisfy a LADR, you may skip this item, as the necessary
Catalog changes will be obvious. ]
A. If you are proposing a new course
or courses, give a title and catalog
description for each. The Registrar will assign course numbers to new
courses, but if you have a preferred number for some course, please suggest
it.
The title of a proposed new course should be short and give readers
a good idea of what the course is about. The reason for this is that
preregistration schedules and student transcripts do not contain course
descriptions and there is not much room on them for course titles. Thus,
a course title like "Cancelled Czechs: Long-Range Consequences of
the Defenestration of Prague" is bad because it will probably appear
on schedules and transcripts as "Lng Rg Cns Def of P". Similarly,
unnecessary superfluous words should be omitted; e.g. eschew "Looking
at Mammals" in favor of just "Mammals".
The part of the catalog
description that presents the content of the proposed course should be
readily comprehensible to people who are ready
to take the course but have not yet done so, while at the same time allowing
readers outside the College (such as graduate school admissions committees)
to quickly determine how much is covered in the course and the level
at which it is taught. Try to limit descriptions to about the same length
as the descriptions already in the Catalog. Avoid being so specific about
course content, works to be read, etc. that the description will need
updating every time a different instructor offers the course. At the
same time, please avoid descriptions like "Mat 222. Prime
Numbers. An examination of the prime numbers."
Groups of courses with a common
theme may be best listed by title only, with a subsequent paragraph describing
them all at once (cf. HIS 211-214,
ID 113-215).
The catalog description should also include any of the following phrases
(or similar ones) which apply to the proposed course:
"Identical to ____." [for cross-listed courses]
"Not open to students with prior credit in ____."
[if course largely duplicates another course]
"Satisfies General Degree Requirement ___."
"Prerequisite: ____."
"Corequisite: ____."
"Prerequisite or corequisite: ____."
"Offered alternate years."
"May be repeated for credit."
"May be repeated for credit with permission of instructor."
Since any Hanover course may be taken with the permission of the instructor,
it is not necessary to list "Permission of instructor" as a
prerequisite unless you especially want to invite people to seek such
permission.
B. If you are proposing to delete a course or courses, tell
which courses they are. If they are courses which have had significant
enrollments,
you may wish to maintain their listings in the Catalog for a year or
two (augmented by the phrase "Last offered in [year]"), to
help alumni who took the course show outside agencies what it was about.
If you are proposing to change a course number, it may be wise to list
both the old and new numbers in the Catalog (for example, in prerequisite
listings for other courses) for a year or two, to avoid confusion. Similarly,
if you are proposing significant changes in major or minor requirements,
you may wish to list both the old and new major/minors in the Catalog
(with a statement of the change-over date), for the convenience of students
who declared under the previous requirements and choose to complete their
programs under those requirements.
C. Be sure and list all Catalog changes implicit in your proposal. Places
in the Catalog that may be affected by the creation or deletion of courses,
or changes in course numbers, include:
Description of your Department's major and/or minor programs
Description of allied Departments' major and/or minor programs or pre-professional
programs
Prerequisite lists of other courses in your Department and allied Departments
Lists of courses satisfying specific General Degree Requirements (pp.
26-35 in 2002-03 Catalog)
D. If you are proposing to delete or add courses which are involved
or might conceivably be involved in any of the College's pre-professional
programs (most notably, elementary or secondary teacher certification
programs), please be sure and contact the people in charge of those programs
to make sure that anything you say in your proposal (about relationships
to those programs) is accurate.
E. If you are proposing changes in a major or minor program, simply
give the requirements for the revised program as they would appear in
the Catalog (using existing listings as models).
7. Provide any additional information relevant to the proposal.
Put here
any additional information about the proposed changes as may be helpful
to the Faculty in considering those changes, or which may
be helpful in integrating proposed new courses into the existing curriculum
in ways agreeable to your Department. For example, if a proposed new
course is essentially a restructuring of an existing course which you
propose to delete, your Department should not only decide whether or
not someone with prior credit in the old course should be able to take
the new one for credit (and if not, the course description for the new
course should say this), but also consider whether a student with a low
grade in the old course (which is being deleted) should be allowed to
use the new course as a "repeat" of the old course (for purposes
of raising the grade).
|